top of page
Search

Automated "creativity" vs. Authentic Originality

Mar 11
2 min read

Over the past few weeks I’ve been thinking about a simple question:


What happens to originality when the world becomes increasingly automated?


Algorithms recommend what we should watch, AI helps us write and design, and social media quietly nudges us toward whatever is already popular. None of these tools are inherently bad, but they do create an interesting tension.


The easier it becomes to generate ideas, the harder it may become to trust our own. It is so easy to take out a phone and film someone failing as many try to go viral. There comes a price because it's as if we are being told to not make any mistakes or the world will find out we are all frauds.


The driving force behind my first book Don’t Think Straight, was the the same pattern across artists, athletes, entrepreneurs and creators: the people who shape culture almost always challenge the systems around them.


And yet most of us grow up inside systems designed to do the opposite.


We’re taught to follow instructions, avoid mistakes, and not rock the boat too much.


Those systems help society function. But they can also quietly discourage the kind of thinking that leads to real change.


Recently I decided to apply to speak at TEDxVictoria about this idea.


Because the topic feels increasingly important and we must start pushing for more originality as the world around us seems to be pusihng more of the same and more of the same.


If originality becomes harder in a world of automation, it might also become more valuable.


Maybe the real skill of the next generation isn’t simply learning to use new tools.


Maybe it’s learning when to question them.


Nothing changes until someone is willing to flirt with the edges of normal. So go get your flirt on.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
A Book Is Not Written in a Straight Line

What self-publishing taught me about discovery, authorship, and using AI without handing over the wheel I thought finishing the manuscript would be the hard part. That is the romantic version of publi

 
 
 

80 Comments


The tension you’re describing is exactly why I’ve started forcing myself to sketch before opening any AI tool—otherwise the algorithm’s “suggestion” just becomes my default. It’s a daily battle to trust the messy, slow version of my own brain. I've been using a simple prompt journal to catch those pre-automated instincts, and it’s helped more than https://yeggi.pro

Like

Hoang Co
Hoang Co
Aug 09

The tension you’re describing is real—I’ve noticed my own drafts start to sound like a blend of whatever’s trending, not what I actually think. It’s a relief to hear someone name that quiet pressure to perform originality rather than just make it. I’ve been using a little prompt that forces me to write the “boring” version first, which helps. https://glbviewer.com

Like

The tension you’re circling here is real—when the algorithm feeds us the "optimal" next step, we stop exercising the muscle that finds the weird, off-path idea. I’ve been wrestling with this exact friction in my own design work lately, and it’s made me more deliberate about turning off the recommendations and starting from a blank page. Curious if https://3daimaker.com

Like

Fred Adu
Fred Adu
Aug 06

The tension you’re describing really hits home—especially that bit about algorithms nudging us toward the popular, because it makes the "harder to be original" part feel almost like a self-fulfilling prophecy. I’ve been wrestling with this exact loop in my own design work lately, and I’ve been using https://ai-picture-generator.net

Like

The tension you’re pointing at is exactly why I’ve started treating AI suggestions as a starting point, not a finish line—but the nudge toward “what’s already popular” is the sneaky part. I’ve been using a little trick to break out of that loop, and it’s been a game-changer for keeping my own voice in the mix. https://free-ai-video.com

Like
bottom of page